[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: warning: semi-long news item! sloan considers releasing
On Fri, 14 Nov 1997, Andrew P. Rodenhiser wrote:
> Shant Pelley <ag344\!/chebucto.ns.ca> had this to say about Re: warning: semi-long news item! s
> }i look at it this way. i'd rather have 35-45 minutes of good music and
> }not have to worry about filler crap.
> True, but how does a band with too many songs decide what's filler
> and what's utter crap. Hard to be objective with your own babies.
> "Well, Sarah's pretty, and Jimmy's clever, and Billy's athletic, and
> Julie's polite, but we only have three seats in the back of the
> Toyota, so which one of the kids doesn't go on vacation with us?"
sure, however, whenever a band plays live they have to pick and choose
what gets played. many bands stick to certain songs because there are
ones they just don't like.
> }kiss' "dressed to kill" clocks in at less than 30 minutes, and i
> }(*OPINION HERE*) don't think there's a bad song on the album!
> I can't disagree on that one! :) But I'll note again that they'd
> released a fine album six months earlier, and released another six
> months later.
fair enough. i can't argue that one ;)