[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Murderecords INC.
- Subject: Re: Murderecords INC.
- From: Andrew Rodenhiser
- Date: Wed, 27 Nov 1996 09:03:27 AST
Adamweezer\!/aol.com <Adamweezer\!/aol.com> had this to say about Murderecords INC.
}Has anyone else noticed the inverse relation between the size and service of
No, I haven't, but now that you mention it:
1) Sloan have gotten "bigger".
2) Murderecords have not gotten bigger.
thus, murderecords is overworked and understaffed, and service has
Consider that they sold 50 000 records in under a year. OK, MCA did
much of the work, but that's still a lot of product for a company
staffed by folks who I suspect have other jobs too.
} So anyway, maybe I'm just really unlucky and agitated right now, but I
}yearn for about a year and half ago when murder was tiny, sloan was broken
}up, ET wasn't, and sloannet was Consistantly interesting, rather than small
}sporatic spurts of intelligence.
You are not alone. The truth is out there.
So are our Sloannet tees...