[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: "Pop" Music -- !!NEW THREAD!!! maybe, if anyone's interested
- Subject: Re: "Pop" Music -- !!NEW THREAD!!! maybe, if anyone's interested
- From: psavage\!/toronto.cbc.ca (geneyus)
- Date: Wed, 8 May 1996 12:20:56 -0400
>OK, you folks toss around this word "pop" like it's a good thing. I
>thought that "pop" music was whatever is currently appealing to the
>masses, as opposed to being a definable genre of musical style. So
>when you folks say that Sloan or TH or the SFz or whoever have a
>nice "pop" feel, what the \!/%#$ do you mean? Define "pop" as a
>musical style rather than simply anything on the Billboard 100.
>I always equated pop with Top 40 radio, as something to be avoided.
>Why do you indie-rock types suddenly embrace it?
Pop music is simply a short form of "popular music". Popular music has
always been known to be very catchy, even when it's irritating. I, myself,
do not see the word as a hinderence as long as it's applied properly. Bands
like the Superfriendz are a pop band just as Weezer is a pop band. Let's
not get hung up on the term, it just means their stuff is singable. If you
look closely at what I said you'll notice that I say "All pop should be as
beautiful as the songs on Girlfriend". I believe that in a perfect world,
the masses would be listening to Sloan, Matthew Sweet, and Sebadoh. They
are all perfect pop songwriters.