[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: James' Report from ECMA's:
- Subject: Re: James' Report from ECMA's:
- From: "C. Trowbridge" <ctrowbri\!/acs.ryerson.ca>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 00:41:51 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 11 Feb 1996, James Rocchi wrote:
> Well, if "Twice Removed" wasn't nominated the year it came out,
> that's NOT Sloan's fault, now is it ?
Actually, as I understand it, bands have to nominate themselves to be
considered for ECMAs and Sloan didn't do that last year. so, in a way, it
was their "fault"...
i think that's how it works anyway & it seems kind of strange. maybe
Colin will post & clarify. I hear he's practically running the ECMA's
these days. -ct